diet tips?

Loriann Carrigan: any diet that produces results (other than water loss) takes time, sorry, no shortcuts except liposuction

Houston Venezia: 1. small and frequent meals --it can be 8meals a day2. prefer fruits and veggies.-- no meal without that3. lots of water - 10 to 15 glass per day4.avoid late dinners5. munching - only on citrus fruitstry it have a nice day...Show more

Germaine Tieken: Try fast diet before christmas (winter diet). http://www.best-fat-burn-strategies.com/winter_die...

Elvin Mannheimer: a fast diet doesn't exsist

Frederick Mccoach: fast diets usually gain fat quickly too.But if you want to loose weigh try not to eat pasta, candies, chololates and high cholestrol foods.Don't eat your night meal.So, forget your dinner.

Comment enfiler correctement une selle anglaise

Comment enfiler correctement une selle anglaise

Lâchez vos étriers avant de monter.

Faites glisser la selle vers l’arrière (dans le sens de la pousse des poils) jusqu’à ce qu’elle s’enclenche. L’arche de l’arçon doit se trouver directement au-dessus du point le plus haut du garrot du cheval. La selle se blottira derrière les omoplates du cheval.

Toilettez votre cheval. La saleté et la perte de cheveux sous une selle peuvent l’irriter et vous mettre mal à l’aise tous les deux.

Assurez-vous que le coussinet est aligné correctement avec les bords de la selle. Pour un tampon profilé, il devrait y avoir environ un pouce de tampon sur tout le pourtour. Dans le cas d’une selle carrée, veillez à laisser au moins un pouce autour du bord avant de la selle. La selle ne doit pas être trop en avant pour rendre le mouvement de l’épaule difficile.

Détachez la sangle et mettez-la de côté. Alternativement, vous pouvez le plier sur le dessus de la selle, en le laissant attaché sur le côté droit (hors selle).

Se tenir sur le côté gauche (près) du cheval, placer la selle et le coussinet sur le dos du cheval avec le pommeau de la selle juste devant le garrot du cheval.

Attachez la sangle aux sangles de sangle du côté extérieur (à droite du cheval), puis amenez-la vers le côté proche (à gauche du cheval). En règle générale, la sangle doit être placée sous le cheval juste derrière ses pattes avant. Si vous pouvez voir un espace entre le coude et la sangle, c’est que la selle est trop en arrière.

Montez les étriers sur les étriers en cuir. Cela les tient à l’écart.

Attachez bien la sangle â€" vous devriez pouvoir mettre la main entre le cheval et la sangle, mais elle devrait être bien ajustée. Assurez-vous d’utiliser les première et troisième bandes de billette ! (pas la deuxième).

Montez et revérifiez votre sangle p! our voir si elle a besoin d’être serrée. C’est fait !

Crash Diets?

Babette Deloe: A juice quick particularly isnt a "vitamin". I realize natural juice fasting includes a type of Jack LaLain offers and you're bodily juicing carrots, apples, and spinach, and so forth and making juices with it. You drink the ones all day after which consume no meals. You can do juice fasts for 30 days and you are actually great (like calorie smart ... you wont die of hunger or some thing!). Water fasting is wherein you consume 0 meals and simplest drink water (NO vitamin sodas or any calorie-much less drink. JUST water). That, I could do not than 7 days. DONT do any heavy workout throughout this interval both. Those fasts are pretty much de-toxing. They arent aimed toward wasting weight. You do shed weight, however should you consume your natural vitamin afterwards, you are going to attain all of it again. I lose probably the most weight consuming usual, complete meals and workout. No false meals. Ask your self, could anyone 50 years in the past consume thi! s? If the reply isn't any - then I dont consume it. Plus with the culmination and vegetables and complete grains - you poo plenty which is helping. Just sayin....Show more

Arnoldo Budzynski: Crash diets are eitherDramatically reducing caloric intakeor Cutting almost or completely one macronutrient group (ie carb/protein/fat)They are very unhealthy and "crash" your body weight but that also means crashing your energy levels and causing many other problems. They should be avoided completely...Show more

Calling all dentists dental hygienists dental assistants?

Damaris Weiler: Dental shades are numbers alone, or letters with numbers.... 112, 113, 114, or A1, A2, A3.5, BI, etc....Maybe the BO you're referring to, or heard, is a two surface cavity on a posterior (back) tooth that needs to be repaired.......and it would be an OB.

Hyo Hardell: i don't think so...

Lue Podewils: BO as in body odor or in the tooth color bo. There is a HUGE difference between the two persons. The assistant can be just a normal person with a few hours of training, where as a hygienist has a 6-12 month or more of actual training Brush often and FLOSS

Need dental advice? Â

Need dental advice?  

answers 0:I have read alot of the advice and answers that people are giving. Some of it is just not accurate and is way off the mark.. I know as long as people are asking questions on here that they are going to get advice from all types of people, with all types of sources, either personal, professional, or just hearsay. Do people really want educated advice from dental professionals or just an opinion by someone who has gone through a similar experience? If you want a real professional opinion, you should really only listen to the advice of assistants, hygientists, and dentists. There are always some of them answering dental questions on here. So is anyone needing real dental advice right now?...Show moreanswers 1:I think it's good that users have identified themselves in their answers or in their profiles as a dental professional. If there is NOTHING in my ! response, such as the phrase "in my office" or "with my patients," I try to add a reference to my being an actual dentist - in spite of popular perception. (haha)It would help us all if we all engaged in that practice so that it didn't seem like we were offering just another opinion or retelling of an old wives' tale....answers 2:Hello maybe you should go to a site for dental hygenist and help there. If you think you know everything why don't you just answer it all then we do the best to give some advice and I say when in doubt about health things go to the dr but other than that most people have common sense and only want opinions.answers 3:YEAH!!!!!!! A voice of reason in this mess!!answers 4:A twenty seven year old bridge has been a good one, but it may have seen its better days. Porcelain chipping off is a common problem, it happens even with the newer bridges. It leaves only two choices, repair or replace. The above responder is correct in the fact that a filling ca! n be placed on this chipped porcelain area, although it will n! ot “completely” hide the black marking of the underlying metal of the bridge that is showing through, nor will this bridge ever be as aesthetically pleasing as it once was but it will offer some coverage so it won't be as noticeable. This is a good option to “repair rather than a replace” though. I would also be hesitant to remove the bridge, if the teeth and bridge are sound and this chipped area isn’t going to present any problem, other than its appearance. The rough porcelain can be easily smoothed giving the patient time to consider their options or do nothing at all to the bridge. Some dentist would prefer to remove the bridge and re-make it; just to be sure the teeth under the bridge are sound, since we can’t see them through the metal of the bridge with an x ray. I can't think of any repair or dental work for that matter, that would cost 2 cents, don't even consider repairing the bridge to be "insane or crazy." Some of the "best dental work" to be found, ! is the "oldest" work seen today. Helen DDS has given the most appropriate answer to your question. So the options of “repair or replace” are up to the patient, if the bridge is sound. The appearance vs. the cost of replacement is usually the deciding factor for most patients. Additional information: Someone advised that the bridge be removed and replace with a removable partial, if finances are an issue. It probably wounldn't be practical to do that, the abutment teeth under the bridge in question would "require crowns," which can be expensive along with the added expense of a "removable partial." Depending on the type of partial selected, it may be "nearly as costly" to take that route not to mention "less acceptable" since it is removable. Having the fixed bridge is the closest thing to natural teeth, with the exception of implants....answers 5:yes please email me [email protected], i really need adviceanswers 6:I'd like some dental advice... but wouldn't you have to! look at my teeth?

Do you think animal testing for medicine is wrong?

Mel Crapo: *I'm not saying I think it's RIGHT, sorry

Robbie Starchman: Yes, I do.There are enough humans who will test drugs and medicines. I've done medical studies. My friends have done them. Some, not all. In the end you'll need to test a medicine meant for human consumption on a human anyway. Plus, in America, there is a recall of drugs every week. Drugs that have ultimately been tested on humans, which end up causing all kinds of other medical problems. Even death. So if this is the case cyrrently with drugs that are tested first on animals, then humans, it's not doing a good job.No animal testing for drugs is OK by me. Rats, monkeys and rabbits might have totally different chemcial reactions than a human. Many many diseases can be wiped out be eating right in the first place. Once in your body you might be able to help by eating raw organic food.Diseases re the cause of pollution, radicals, diet and environmental hazards, and testing drugs on animals is wrong! for the animal , ethically wrong and in any case, does not work to find the bes t drugs- which always have to be tried in people in the end. I know enough people would say yes to being the ones tested. Money is a good incentive, but facts and results don't care about money....Show more

Cierra Gadbaw: I'm not saying I think it's WRONG, I'm saying I'm unsure of what to think about it. Also, if you are against it, would you say that there are alternatives or what? I mean that as a serious question.

Lynn Hollars: I hate life- But what about the medicine that we need? For cancer, AIDs, etc. Things that have not yet been cured.

Moises Rupinski: That largely depends on what you mean by wrong.Do i think it is wrong in that it can aid in the development of cures that save lives? No.Do i think it is wrong in that it forces a non consenting being into experiments that may produce negative effects in the subject (eg LD50/side effects)? Then yes i think that is wrong.! I'm well aware that medicines i've taken over my life have bee! n derived from animal studies & that medicines will come in the future from animal testing, however that doesn't justify it no more than cures that have been found in WW2 japan/nazi human test subjects (gunshot wound treatment/decompression/hypothermia etc) is a justification for using humans. I'd rather large funding to seek alternative technological methods & a use of volunteer prisoners (to avoid the loop of testing on wrongly incarcerated humans) in return for monetary rewards eg extra calls etc.The main justification for animal testing utilises a utilitarian point of view ie the net good outweighs the net bad (10 rats to save 100 humans is a utilitarian stance for example). However utilitarianism rejects the notion of individual inherent rights & the argument can just as easily be flipped on its head ie 10 humans to save 100 humans. One cannot have an impasse saying '' animal testing is A-Ok but oh no you cant use humans that is wrong'', there needs to be a logical rea! son for that & i personally cannot find one if it uses utilitarianism. Human testing would be nearly equivilant a justification as animals from this POV.....Hence why Singer (bioethicist & utilitarian) gets in trouble for his controversial statements that are perfectly in line with his philosophical belief.It is a highly debatable topic with strong arguments from both sides from the various academic fields, i personally oppose it but recognise that an outright ban starting tomorrow would not work & would jepordise many human lives. There are also cases where animals must be used such as developing drugs for animals in vetinary science. Here is a link from two opposing views on the merits/drawbacks of anima testing in medical sciencehttp://www.newint.org/sections/argument/2011/06/01......Show more

Shelley Stevens: I think its not good to hurt those sweet innocent animals

Rachell Meese: I think at the moment it is the best of several evils. I don't like it, but I ! accept the necessity.

Phillip Modafferi: Yes. The majority of ani! mal tests never yield reliable results and animal abuse, no matter what veil it is hidden behind, is still animal abuse, and I cannot condone it.If everyone who had AIDS wore a condom, the disease would be non existent within a few decades. And cancer tests have been done on billions of mice and yet no magical mouse has been found that can provide an answer, yet money and time is still being wasted on illogical research that has proved itself unfounded....Show more

Berry Gilmore: Consider the alternative: Medicines are first tested on HUMANS.At some point, ANY medicine must be tested on a LIVE participant. NO amount of computer simulation can equal the random environment of a live animal. Without animal testing, thousands provide HUMANS would have to die in the testing process.Another alternative would be to disallow the production of any medicine or procedure which MIGHT interfere with the life process. This would stop the development of ALL medications, especially ! cures for cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer's Disease, sickle anemia, etc. Stem cell research would ALSO be stopped, as these ALSO have great potential to harm as well as help.Animal testing, as ugly as it is, is a necessary evil for the advancement of medical technology....Show more

Rona Espalin: Of course it's wrong. Those morons need to test on humans since the medicine IS for humans.

Blair Abdi: I hate life- But what about the medicine that we need? For cancer, AIDs, etc. Things that have not yet been cured.

Giovanna Sherlin: absolutely whats the point of it pharmacy drugs are Shi† ancient remedies kick åss

Dexter Dicostanzo: I think it's wrong. It's stupid that they test animals today when older medicine works just fine. I got sick for a LONG time and newer medicine didn't do $h!†. My mom had some older medicine left, I tried that, and I was up the next morning.

Tillie Wynott: @i hate life- I bet that your medicine was a placebo. Let me guess! , you had a stomach virus or a cold or something else where the only re! al cure is time. It would be like me telling you that wearing a red shirt will cure you, it's all in your head.Ever heard of Snake Oil? It was a placebo that scammed people into thinking it worked....Show more

Elden Bardach: I am opposed to testing for medical research. Part of this is because the organisations and corporations which are involved in research are in competition with each other which means they do not share the information they get from testing which means more testing must occur for similar answers. I also believe that death and disease is natural and that we will never be able to cure everything. A big factor in why our species is currently overpopulated is because of medical treatments which have drastically reduced infant mortality and extended the longevity of many more people. This is indirectly responsible for extreme environmental damage since we have no idea how to operate sustainable with such an enormous population on the planet.We should sto! p prioritising the lives of humans above otherwise healthy animals bred for the purpose of experimentation. Human suffering is very sad, but it is just a fact that most people consider human suffering to be worse than non-human suffering. I do not, so I think it is unreasonable to create more suffering in the hope of reducing some human suffering.Opposing animal testing also doesn't mean opposing medicines or treatments altogether. There are countless treatments and medications available RIGHT NOW which would continue to be available if we decided to stop testing on animals. We should stop trying to fight nature and instead see infirmity with different eyes... something which occurs for the good of our species and our planet....Show more

Lou Ravelo: it is wrong the animals cannot consent. they are not our slaves they have a right to life without wanton suffering and cruelty. there are much more humane alternatives that actually produce better results. it should be tes! ted on humans because it is for humans.it is hypocritical: they say we ! test on animals because they are like us..but aspirin causes tumors in mice... but they still use it on humans because they say.. animals are not like us. plus honestly a lot of medicine is for diseases that would be non existent if people focused more on their diet and looking after themselves....Show more

Scot Sepulbeda: OK, let's be realistic for a minute.Like 6% of animal testing is for medicine. The other 94% is for stupid stuff like cosmetics. If you just boycott the cosmetic companies that test on animals, that's 94% you've done to eliminate testing in your life.The world isn't vegan. The FDA will continue to use animal trials as a testing prior to human trials. But there are vegans who are working on tests that are the equivalent of animal studies. Support these people. Veganism isn't all or nothing, it's doing what you can. You don't get to choose if you need the new anti-cancer drug on the market because the other medicines didn't work. You don't get to choo! se if your daughter needs the new leukemia drug that was tested on animals. You don't just stop using medicine because you don't like how it got on the market. You need the medicine, you take it.If you stop using cosmetics tested on animals, that's 94% done.Push for non-animal equivalents for the other 6%. It's gradually being done, if not here in the US, it's being done in Europe. We in the US will take European trials as animal testing, btw. You're not going to make a difference dying, and you're not going to make a difference by abstractly saying whether you're for or against testing.You will make a difference buying leaping bunny, non animal tested cosmetics.You will make a difference advocating non-animal tests for safety/efficacy.Everything else is pure philosophy. Like Theoretical Physics. (anyone else annoyed that Sheldon struts like he's hot stuff on Big Bang Theory, when he's a glorified philosopher who does math? They haven't proven string theory at all yet, very! few tests have been done. Brian Greene, ya'll)...Show more

Ronni! e Sardi: Well it could be tested on you instead.What is that?Stay with testing it on animals?ok.

Cornelius Thornborrow: No I do not think it is wrong. Drugs are developed for the purpose of collective human survival. They are tested on animals to ensure safety prior to usage by humans.It does not surprise me that most vegans are opposed to it, even though most of them have benefited from it. Most vegans seem completely oblivious to their own double standards, and I'm sure you'll get some responses that attest to that fact.

Aron Ramu: Yup. Animal commodification is animal commodification. Torture is torture. The excruciating death of hundreds of thousands to *potentially* save lives, lives threatened in large part due to dietary-related disease as resultant of torturing, killing, and consuming MORE ANIMALS is not ethically justifiable in any way. Interesting definition of "vegan" you have going on there:"Treating sentient beings as things is WRONG! 'Cept when we ! wanna."...Show more

Comment installer et utiliser 7capture pour les captures d’écran

Comment installer et utiliser 7capture pour les captures d’écran

Cliquez sur Capture rapide. Cela vous donnera des options pour votre capture.

Allez sur 7capture.com et cliquez sur le bouton Télécharger maintenant pour télécharger le logiciel. C’est un fichier exécutable, vous n’avez donc pas besoin d’un programme de décompression pour cela.

Sélectionnez quelle fenêtre. Si vous sélectionnez la deuxième option, vous pouvez sélectionner la fenêtre que vous voulez capturer.

Démarrez le programme. 7capture a une interface utilisateur (interface utilisateur) relativement petite et simple. Cependant, la simplicité signifie aussi qu’il a moins de capacités.

Double-cliquez sur le nom du fichier pour l’installer. C’est maintenant que vous allez changer le chemin de l’installation si vous le souhaitez.